The Quest 3, a mid-range VR headset that shares certain capabilities with the more costly Quest Pro, was recently launched by Meta. There are various factors to consider before deciding to use virtual reality for gaming, leisure, or employment. So let have Meta Quest 3 vs Quest Pro in this article.
The operating system and app library are nearly identical. To decide the best VR headset and which is perfect for you, we must consider pricing, performance, image quality, comfort, and unique features.
While we do not yet have all of the answers to the Meta Quest 3, we do have enough information to make an informed suggestion. In many aspects, the Quest 3 is a more powerful Quest 2 with improved optical components. The most of the other information is the same.
Comfort
Because the headgear is often thought of as technology, such as a computer, tablet, or gaming console, comfort is commonly disregarded in VR. Because it is a wearable, comfort is an important aspect in usage.
The Meta Quest 3 will be roughly 200 grams lighter than the Quest Pro, which may surprise some. Despite this, the Quest Pro will be more comfortable for the majority of individuals, as detailed in our Meta Quest Pro review. With the battery in the rear of the headset, the weight is spread more evenly rather than pushing into your cheekbones, nose, and forehead.
VR face is a typical side effect after wearing a Quest 2 for an hour or longer. After removing the headset, a crimson ring in the shape of the headset stays for quite some time. Some individuals notice it more than others, and accessory headbands might help relieve this issue.
The design of the Quest 3 is similar, with a complete light shield and battery at the front. The reduced shape should alleviate some of the pressure on the face, although the VR face may still be visible.
The design of the Quest Pro allows the display to hover in front of your eyes without putting strain on your nose or cheeks. The disadvantage is that the weight, while balanced, sits on your brow. It’s a bony section that can support more weight but some users find it uncomfortable.
The more open facial interface of the Quest Pro is useful for working out in VR or playing hard games that may produce perspiration and steaminess in a Quest 3. Most people believe that the Quest Pro is more comfortable overall.
Performance
Devices labeled as pro models are often quicker, however this is not always the case when comparing generations. The Quest Pro will be available in October 2022, while Meta’s Quest 3 will be available a year later at Meta Connect 2023.
Even a few months in technology might bring about significant changes. The Qualcomm CPU that powered the Quest Pro was an upgrade over the Quest 2, but the Quest 3 might be substantially quicker.
According to Meta, the Quest 3 has double the GPU performance of the Quest 2. The advantage over the Quest Pro will be roughly same. However, game and app developers will continue to strive for Quest 2 compatibility for at least another year, if not two.
The performance improvement may not be evident for some time. When developers begin targeting the Quest 3, the lesser performance of the Quest Pro may result in a more obvious difference in graphics quality or frame rate.
Read also : Meta Quest 3 vs Meta Quest 2 : The Biggest Difference
Image quality
Meta improved the clarity of the Quest Pro by adopting pancake optics instead of the Quest 2’s older Fresnel lenses. The Quest 3 will benefit from that study, as well as from the adoption of pancake lenses, which minimize “god ray” artifacts and enlarge the sweet spot for improved edge-to-edge clarity.
Meta’s highest-resolution display will be found in the Quest 3. Meta hasn’t specified a precise pixel count, but it will be crisper than the Quest Pro.
The Quest Pro, on the other hand, has mini-LED illumination for deeper blacks and a wider dynamic range.
Special features
The media was drawn to one of the Quest Pro’s headlining features, a color mixed-reality display that merges images into your physical world. Meta’s VR headset presented a compelling look of what future AR glasses would be capable of.
While mixed reality is useful for demos, few games and applications give a compelling incentive to utilize it. It’s entertaining to play a virtual board game on your table, but the experience is enhanced when your pals have faces, even if they’re cartoonish.
When you’re moving around and searching for computer aid in everyday life, AR could be a function that works best as glasses. The main benefit of mixed reality when wearing a VR headset is being able to view your surroundings well enough to walk around and communicate with individuals who aren’t wearing a headset.
Whether you are a fan of mixed reality or not, the Quest 3 will surpass the Quest Pro in this category. The Quest 3 also contains a depth sensor to automatically map your space, whereas the Quest Pro requires human marking off of a safe play area.
The Quest Pro still has several distinct features that the Quest 3 lacks. Eye- and face-tracking are only feasible with the more costly Meta headset’s technology.
The Quest Pro comes with a simple charging port that charges the battery as soon as you put it down. Plugging in a cable isn’t difficult, and the dock is only useful since it charges the controllers at the same time.
Check also : Leaked setup video for Quest 3
Because the Quest 3 runs on AA batteries, there may be instances when your controllers die and you run out of batteries. The Quest 3 controllers resemble the Touch Pro or Quest Pro controllers but lack precise tracking. The cameras on the Quest 3 must see the controllers in order to track them, however the Touch Pro controllers are invisible.
Price
There are pros and cons for both headsets, but the Quest 3 is a newer device with better image quality and superior performance at a lower price. For $500, it’s hard to go wrong with a Meta Quest 3.
That said, the Quest Pro wins on comfort and ease of use. Professionals might choose the Quest Pro for those reasons alone. Add in eye- and face-tracking for VR chats and meetings and you can see where it could be worth the extra cost.
Which is best for you?
For most individuals, the Quest 3 is an obvious decision. If you’re looking for a low-cost VR headset for gaming, fitness, 360 movies, and exploring virtual and mixed reality in general, this is an interesting new headset with a large library and a bright future. Meta will continue to offer the Quest 2, currently priced at $300 for people on a low budget.
The Quest Pro is ideal for persons with sensitive skin who don’t want to be bothered by pressure and a humid headset. If you’re going to be in VR throughout the day and don’t want to wait an hour for the affects of VR face to fade, Meta’s premium headset answers that problem in large part.
If you want to use a VR headset for work and will be in and out frequently, the dock and rechargeable controllers keep batteries charged and ready to go at all times. The Quest Pro can animate your avatar’s face and eyes for a more genuine look and nonverbal communication during virtual meetings.
Finally, if the Quest Pro is out of reach for most people, the Quest 3 will suffice. If you can afford either, think about how you’ll use the gadget before making a selection. Meta will sell both for a purpose.
